MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167122513 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2010.5494914

Differential Radon Transform for gait recognition

2010· article· en· W2167122513 on OpenAlexaff
Tanaya Guha, Rabab Ward

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGait Recognition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadon transformGaitSilhouetteComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Set (abstract data type)Adaptation (eye)Gait analysisDifferential (mechanical device)Image (mathematics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experimental studies have proved that high frequency components have the maximum contribution in silhouette-based gait recognition. The Radon Transform (RT), used in gait analysis for its ability to compute useful directional projections, fails to capture the necessary high frequency content of images. In this paper we present the Differential Radon Transform (DiffRT) - a novel adaptation of the standard RT designed to extract such high frequency information efficiently. The proposed transform is used to extract a set of features from gait silhouettes. We provide both theoretical and experimental evidence that DiffRT can indeed collect the important image information to facilitate gait-based human recognition. Averaged silhouettes from USF database are used for performance evaluation following the gait challenge framework. Our proposed method achieves high recognition accuracy and outperforms several state-of-the-art algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGait Recognition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207