Fetal and neonatal outcomes in women taking domperidone during pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The safety of domperidone in pregnancy remains unknown. Therefore, the study aimed to prospectively evaluate the fetal outcomes of women who were taking domperidone during pregnancy. In a prospective cohort study design, 120 1st- trimester pregnant women who were taking domperidone for controlling gastrointestinal tract symptoms and 212 age-matched pregnant women not exposed to any potential teratogenic agent, were followed-up until delivery. In the case group, domperidone was indicated for control of functional gastrointestinal disorders in 59.2%, the maximum dose was 30 mg/day and exposure occurred between 2(+4) and 20 weeks' gestation. Fetal outcomes including gestational age at birth, birth weight and length, head circumference at birth, and 1- and 5-min Apgar score were similar in the two study groups. There were three babies born with malformations in each group (OR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.1, 2.8). In conclusion, domperidone does not appear to be a major human teratogen. However, our findings require further confirmation in larger studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".