MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167178257 · doi:10.1152/ajplung.00492.2001

Molecular cloning of actin filament-associated protein: a putative adaptor in stretch-induced Src activation

2002· article· en· W2167178257 on OpenAlexaff
Monika Lodyga, E. Mourgeon, Bing Han, Shaf Keshavjee, Mingyao Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSignal transducing adaptor proteinCell biologyProto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SrcBiologyActinMolecular biologyTyrosine phosphorylationSH3 domainSignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mechanical stretch-induced activation of c-Src is an important step for signal transduction of stretch-induced fetal rat lung cell proliferation. This process appears to be mediated through actin filament-associated protein (AFAP), encoded by a gene originally cloned from the chicken. In the present study, we cloned the rat AFAP gene from fetal rat lungs. Its mRNA and protein are differentially expressed among various tissues. The protein is colocalized with actin filaments in fetal rat lung epithelial cells and fibroblasts. Mechanical stretch increased tyrosine phosphorylation of rat AFAP and its binding to c-Src within the initial several minutes. Src SH2 and SH3 binding motifs are highly conserved in the AFAP proteins (from chicken, rat to human). On the basis of the molecular structure of AFAP protein, we speculate that it is an adaptor in mechanical stretch-induced activation of c-Src. A novel model of mechanoreception is proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular PhysiologySame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207