MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167207109 · doi:10.1128/aac.49.3.873-883.2005

Human Cytomegalovirus Resistance to Antiviral Drugs

2005· review· en· W2167207109 on OpenAlexaff
Clare Gilbert, Guy Boivin

Bibliographic record

VenueAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman cytomegalovirusImmunologyMedicineRetinitisImmunosuppressionCytomegalovirusHerpesviridaeViral diseaseVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infections are common and lead to lifelong infections. In immunocompetent individuals, primary infections are mostly subclinical or they may be associated with a self-limited mononucleosis-like syndrome. In contrast, infections in immunocompromised hosts (either primary infections, reactivations from latency, or reinfections) are associated with important morbidity and mortality. In patients with AIDS, the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has decreased the overall incidence of HCMV disease, mainly retinitis and gastrointestinal infections, by about 80% (50, 105). However, the functional benefit of HAART (i.e., restoration of specific HCMV-specific immune responses) may take up to 3 to 6 months to occur, and some patients do not have access to or do not respond to HAART (3, 40, 67, 104). Thus, HCMV still remains a concern in AIDS patients with CD4 counts <50 to 100 cells/μl. A specific HCMV syndrome consisting of fever, malaise, arthralgia, and neutropenia may occur in solid-organ transplant (SOT) patients, in particular, those developing a primary HCMV infection (i.e., HCMV-seronegative recipient from a HCMV-seropositive donor [D+/R−]) during the first 3 months posttransplantation. In addition, invasive HCMV disease may involve different organs, such as the lungs, liver, and gastrointestinal tract. In the absence of antiviral intervention, symptomatic HCMV infections occur in approximately 39 to 41% of heart-lung transplant recipients, 9 to 35% of heart transplant recipients, 22 to 29% of liver and pancreas transplant recipients, 8 to 32% of kidney transplant recipients, 50% of kidney-pancreas transplant recipients, and 22% of small-bowel transplant recipients (114), with the highest incidence seen in D+/R− patients. Finally, active HCMV infections have been associated with indirect effects, such as dysfunction or rejection of the transplanted organ, an increased risk for bacterial or fungal opportunistic infections, and accelerated atherosclerosis in heart transplant recipients (109). Among allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, pneumonia and enteritis are the most common clinical manifestations of HCMV disease. In HCMV-seropositive recipients, active HCMV infections occur in 70 to 80% of patients; and in the absence of antiviral intervention, disease develops in 20 to 35% of those individuals, whereas active infections occur in only 15% of seronegative recipients of marrow from a seropositive donor (102). HCMV pneumonia remains associated with a significant risk of mortality, even when specific antiviral treatment is administered (18, 101). Gastrointestinal disease, alone or in association with pulmonary disease, is the second most common clinical manifestation of HCMV infections in that setting (85). In addition to AIDS patients and transplant recipients, HCMV infections have been associated with serious complications in other immunocompromised hosts, such as cancer patients, mostly those suffering from hematologic malignancies (48), and children with congenital primary immunodeficiencies (135). Finally, congenital HCMV infections can result in severe sequelae in newborns or during the first years of life (22).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations229
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapySame topicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus researchFrench-language works237,207