MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167207927 · doi:10.1097/paf.0b013e3181847e3d

Sulfuric Acid Injury

2008· article· en· W2167207927 on OpenAlexaff
Evan W. Matshes, Kirsten A Taylor, Valerie J. Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal and GI Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfuric acidAutopsyIngestionForensic pathologyMedicinePoison controlInjury preventionPathologySurgeryMedical emergencyInternal medicineChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Injuries and deaths from exposure to caustic substances are infrequently reported in the forensic pathology literature. Strong acids like sulfuric acid produce a predictable set of injuries with cutaneous exposure and ingestion. Multiple factors influence the resultant pathology, but from the perspective of the autopsy pathologist, the most important is the length of postingestion survival. We report the case of a young man whose desire to 'clean his honor' was manifested through the consumption of a large quantity of sulfuric acid drain cleaner. Although a myriad of physical findings were present at autopsy, the majority of these most likely represented the postmortem action of sulfuric acid on tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine & PathologySame topicEsophageal and GI PathologyFrench-language works237,207