Sites and modes of action of proctolin and the FLP F2 on lobster cardiac muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At the threshold concentration (1-10 pmol l(-1)), the neuropeptide hormones proctolin (PR) and the FLRFamide-like peptide (FLP) F(2) cause an increase in amplitude of electrically evoked contractions (each contraction is a brief tetanus) of lobster heart ostial muscle. At higher concentrations each peptide also induces an increase in tonus (contracture). The PR-induced contracture and augmentation of tetani are proportional to increases in [Ca2+]i. The rate of onset and recovery of peptide-induced effects on both tetani and contracture appeared to reduced by Ca2+ storage by the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). Enhanced tetani following a contracture may be due to enhanced voltage-gated Ca2+ current and sarcoplasmic reticular (SR) Ca2+ loading. The SR Ca2+ loading appears to be specific for PR and F2, since glutamic-acid-induced contractures are not followed by increased tetani. The prolonged elevation of [Ca2+]i during contracture causes a right-ward shift in the force-pCa curve indicating a decrease in myofibrillar sensitivity to Ca2+. Blocking voltage-gated Ca2+ channels with Cd2+, nifedipine or verapamil, while reducing tetani, does not prevent peptide-induced contracture and enhanced tetani. Opening SR Ca2+ channels and depleting SR Ca2+ with either caffeine or ryanodine blocked tetani but permitted accelerated peptide-induced contractures. We conclude that PR and F2 at low concentration enhance voltage-dependent Ca2+ induced Ca2+ release from the SR, while higher hormone levels directly gate Ca2+ entry across the sarcolemma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".