MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Surface Membranes, Golgi Complexes, and Vacuolar Systems

2002· review· en· W2167267182 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Locke

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Review of Entomology · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGolgi apparatusCell biologyEukaryoteInsectFunction (biology)Evolutionary biologyVertebrateMetamorphosisEcologyBiochemistryEndoplasmic reticulum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the absence of fossils, the cells of vertebrates are often described in lieu of a general animal eukaryote model, neglecting work on insects. However, a common ancestor is nearly a billion years in the past, making some vertebrate generalizations inappropriate for insects. For example, insect cells are adept at the cell remodeling needed for molting and metamorphosis, they have plasma membrane reticular systems and vacuolar ferritin, and their Golgi complexes continue to work during mitosis. This review stresses the ways that insect cells differ from those of vertebrates, summarizing the structure of surface membranes and vacuolar systems, especially of the epidermis and fat body, as a prerequisite for the molecular studies needed to understand cell function. The objective is to provide a structural base from which molecular biology can emerge from biochemical description into a useful analysis of function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnual Review of EntomologySame topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchFrench-language works237,207