MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167267675 · doi:10.1109/milcom.2008.4753248

Time reversal: Algorithms for M-ARY target classification using array signal processing

2008· article· en· W2167267675 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClassifier (UML)AlgorithmComputer scienceTransducerElement (criminal law)Signal processingUnderwaterSIGNAL (programming language)Underwater acoustic communicationMaximum likelihoodNoise (video)Sonar signal processingSpeech recognitionDetection theoryAcousticsArtificial intelligenceMathematicsTelecommunicationsPhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An M-ary time reversal (TR) maximum likelihood classifier for a single pair of transmitting and receiving transducer element was derived in for underwater acoustic target detection applications. This paper considers a more general TR setup consisting of a P-element transmitting array and an N element receiving array and derives the M-ary conventional and TR classifiers for the multielement case in an electromagnetic communication environment. We show that the TR algorithm provides a classification gain of over 3 dB at low signal to noise ratios as compared to the conventional classifiers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207