MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167314566 · doi:10.1111/nicc.12177

Supporting patients' and families' religious and spiritual needs in <scp>ICU</scp> – can we do more?

2015· editorial· en· W2167314566 on OpenAlexaff
Fiona Timmins, Margaret T Naughton, Sotirios Plakas, Barbara Pesut

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing in Critical Care · 2015
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersHealth Research BoardLondon South Bank UniversityNHS Education for ScotlandNHS Health ScotlandTrinity College DublinJohn Templeton Foundation
KeywordsPsychologyNursingMedicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For both families and patients, admission\nto the hospital environment can\nbe frightening. This sense of fear is\nmagnified in the intensive care unit\n(ICU) by the severe conditions and an\nintensive technological environment.\nWhile nurses grow accustomed to this,\nwe know from first-hand experience\nthat patients and families experience\nthe ICU as a daunting and dehumanizing\nenvironment. In the ICU, patients’\nidentities change as they lose emotional\nintimacy (Plakas et al., 2009). ICUis also\nthe place where many, perhaps for the\nfirst time, face their own mortality

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing in Critical CareSame topicFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsFrench-language works237,207