Anelastic Internal Wave Packet Evolution and Stability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract As upward-propagating anelastic internal gravity wave packets grow in amplitude, nonlinear effects develop as a result of interactions with the horizontal mean flow that they induce. This qualitatively alters the structure of the wave packet. The weakly nonlinear dynamics are well captured by the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, which is derived here for anelastic waves. In particular, this predicts that strongly nonhydrostatic waves are modulationally unstable and so the wave packet narrows and grows more rapidly in amplitude than the exponential anelastic growth rate. More hydrostatic waves are modulationally stable and so their amplitude grows less rapidly. The marginal case between stability and instability occurs for waves propagating at the fastest vertical group velocity. Extrapolating these results to waves propagating to higher altitudes (hence attaining larger amplitudes), it is anticipated that modulationally unstable waves should break at lower altitudes and modulationally stable waves should break at higher altitudes than predicted by linear theory. This prediction is borne out by fully nonlinear numerical simulations of the anelastic equations. A range of simulations is performed to quantify where overturning actually occurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".