Democratic Transits and Their Influence on the Election Laws in Russia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The represented article is devoted to the analysis of peculiarities of embodiment of democratic transits into the legal field of the Russian state and their effect on election legislation in Russia. As a result it was concluded that for Russia namely in the context of election legal relations the effect of democratic principles has great value that is reduced to the following one: approval of internationally accepted values in the state sphere of Russia, increase of the responsibility level both of state and personality, wide distribution of justice principles that as a result will lead to the increase of population trust to the state system apparatus with simultaneous quality increase of officials’ work. At the attention is paid to that the modern democracy in Russia bears formal character, it doesn’t express and can’t express interests of the population majority, as it happens in the conditions of western democracy. In this connection the basic task in the part of indirect embodiment of democracy principles in the election legal relations is the development of mechanisms of their implementation, which were already developed and are valid in the foreign countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it