MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167388995 · doi:10.3137/ao922.2009

Mesoscale wind climate modelling in steep mountains

2009· article· en· W2167388995 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jean‐Paul Pinard, Robert Benoit, John D. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueATMOSPHERE-OCEAN · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesoscale meteorologyDownscalingClimatologyEnvironmental scienceTroposphereRadiosondeClimate modelGeostrophic windMeteorologyWind speedAtmospheric sciencesGeologyClimate changeGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Although the Mesoscale Community Compressible (MC2) model successfully reproduces the wind climate (for wind energy development purposes) of the Gaspé region, equivalent simulations for the steep mountainous southern Yukon have been unsatisfactory. An important part of the problem lies in the provision of suitable boundary conditions in the lower troposphere. This paper will describe an alternative provision of boundary conditions to the MC2 model based partly on standard National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) Reanalysis statistics, however, with modified lower tropospheric conditions based on local radiosonde measurements. The MC2 model is part of the AnemoScope wind energy simulation toolkit which applies statistical‐dynamical downscaling of basic large‐scale weather situations (i.e., the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis) to simulate the steadystate wind climate of a complex region. A case study summarized here imposes a typical mean winter temperature inversion on the boundary conditions to reduce downward momentum transfer in the MC2 model over the Whitehorse region. In conjunction with this step, the geostrophic wind at the boundaries is held constant (with height) in speed and direction, based on the (observed) dominant southwesterly winds above the mountaintops. The resulting simulation produces wind directions within the modelled domain that are in much better agreement with the available measurements. However, despite the imposed atmospheric stability, downward transfer of horizontal momentum from aloft still appears to exceed that occurring in nature. It is recommended that (in future studies of this type regarding mountain wind climate) the input statistics processed from the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis be modified by referencing the geostrophic winds to a level above the mountaintops. It is also suggested that converting to a height (z) coordinate system may reduce the erroneous downward momentum transfer found in the present terrain‐following grid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueATMOSPHERE-OCEANSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207