MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167392159 · doi:10.1109/tap.2011.2163740

Constrained Inverse Near-Field Scattering Using High Resolution Wire Grid Models

2011· article· en· W2167392159 on OpenAlexaff
Badr Omrane, Yves Goussard, Jean‐Jacques Laurin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClassification of discontinuitiesConjugate gradient methodComputationInverse problemComputer scienceResistorAlgorithmMathematicsMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The microwave inverse problem is addressed using a wire grid model representation with capacitors loaded in parallel with resistors to respectively replace the permittivity and the conductivity of the device under test. A new approach is presented to embed the properties of isotropy and positiveness of the constitutive parameters without additional penalty terms or weighting parameters. An edge-preserving regularization technique is used to better estimate the discontinuities present in the device under test (DUT) and to decrease the sensitivity to noise during the reconstruction process. The optimization algorithm makes use of the conjugate gradient method to minimize the objective function. Synthetic data are used to assess the reconstruction speed of the new method. Simulation results show a five-fold reduction of the computation time compared to what had been presented previously. Experimental near-field measurements at 2.45 GHz on thin plate DUTs are used to assess the validity of the proposed reconstruction method. Satisfactory results are obtained and a spatial resolution of λ/20 is achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207