Channel assignment in multi-hop TDD W-CDMA cellular networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Relaying is a fundamental concept in multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks whereby communications between mobile terminals are carried out through intermediate nodes. The small distance and the potential high transmission rate between the relaying entities draws our attention to the significance of multi-hop relaying in hot and/or dead spots. Consequently, when relaying is employed in cellular networks, poor communications to and from the base station due to severe multi-path fading and/or noise can be avoided. Hence, in this paper, multi-hop relaying is used as an overlay architecture for single-hop time division duplex (TDD) wideband-code division multiple access (W-CDMA) cellular networks. A major challenge pertaining to the introduction of this technology into cellular networks is the design of an efficient slot assignment algorithm for relaying nodes. In this paper, we propose a heuristic slot assignment scheme, namely delay-sensitive slot assignment (DSSA). DSSA is capable of fully utilizing a limited number of channels to enhance spatial reuse and reduce the end-to-end delay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it