MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167414242 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.121

On Forming the Detection Set for Multicell Multiuser Detection in Narrowband Cellular Systems

2007· article· en· W2167414242 on OpenAlexaff
Shirin Karimifar, J.K. Cavers

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrowbandComputer scienceMultiuser detectionBase stationFadingBandwidth (computing)WidebandInterference (communication)Bit error rateSet (abstract data type)Power (physics)Detection theoryElectronic engineeringAlgorithmReal-time computingTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsCode division multiple accessDetectorEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We previously presented a joint maximum likelihood multiuser detection (JML-MUD) technique that achieves single cell clusters in narrowband systems by reducing the effects of interference from other-cell cochannel users. Since no bandwidth expansion is needed, the capacity becomes comparable to that of wideband systems. In our initial work we used the instantaneous power received from each user at the desired base station to rank and select users for the detection set. In this work, we propose the use of the average reception power over fading and compare the resulting bit error rate to that of instantaneous power as the selection criterion. In addition, we investigate the effect of detection set size on the performance of the system. This allows a tradeoff between the computational cost of adding users to the detection set and the improvement it makes to the performance of the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207