Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les interactions entre influences globales, mondialisées et de type occidental, et traditions locales différenciées forment le tissu de l’expérience humaine contemporaine. La généralisation de la circulation des capitaux, des biens, des idées et des hommes, ainsi que la prise de conscience de leur interconnexion, sont constitutifs du processus de globalisation, notamment dans le domaine de l’alimentation. Lieu privilégié de rencontre du global et du local, une anthropologie de l’alimentation polynésienne permet la mise en évidence d’un processus d’adaptation du local au global, une forme de « glocalisation alimentaire ». Appliquée aux Îles de la Société et à Rapa (Polynésie française), elle met en évidence la complexité mouvante des interrelations qui lient les hommes entre eux, à leurs traditions et à des influences exogènes. La prise de conscience par les acteurs sociaux de nouvelles formes de modèles normatifs possibles permet de dépasser les modèles alimentaires parfois vécus comme imposés, entre résistance, adaptation et création hybride.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".