Changes in extracellular K<sup>+</sup> concentration modulate contractility of rat and rabbit cardiac myocytes via the inward rectifier K<sup>+</sup> current <i>I</i><sub><b>K1</b></sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanisms underlying the inotropic effect of reductions in [K(+)](o) were studied using recordings of membrane potential, membrane current, cell shortening and [Ca(2+)](i) in single, isolated cardiac myocytes. Three types of mammalian myocytes were chosen, based on differences in the current density and intrinsic voltage dependence of the inwardly rectifying background K(+) current I(K1) in each cell type. Rabbit ventricular myocytes had a relatively large I(K1) with a prominent negative slope conductance whereas rabbit atrial cells expressed much smaller I(K1), with little or no negative slope conductance. I(K1) in rat ventricle was intermediate in both current density and slope conductance. Action potential duration is relatively short in both rabbit atrial and rat ventricular myocytes, and consequently both cell types spend much of the duty cycle at or near the resting membrane potential. Rapid increases or decreases of [K(+)](o) elicited significantly different inotropic effects in rat and rabbit atrial and ventricular myocytes. Voltage-clamp and current-clamp experiments showed that the effects on cell shortening and [Ca(2+)](i) following changes in [K(+)](o) were primarily the result of the effects of alterations in I(K1), which changed resting membrane potential and action potential waveform. This in turn differentially altered the balance of Ca(2+) efflux via the sarcolemmal Na(+)-Ca(2+) exchanger, Ca(2+) influx via voltage-dependant Ca(2+) channels and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) release in each cell type. These results support the hypothesis that the inotropic effect of alterations of [K(+)](o) in the heart is due to significant non-linear changes in the current-voltage relation for I(K1) and the resulting modulation of the resting membrane potential and action potential waveform.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".