MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167504727 · doi:10.1080/08865655.2001.9695573

Informal transborder recycling on the U.S.‐Mexico border: The cartoneros of Nuevo Laredo

2001· article· en· W2167504727 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Martín Medina

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Borderlands Studies · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicTaxation and Compliance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordscardboardJoint (building)Informal sectorBusinessQualitative analysisQualitative researchInternational tradeEconomyEconomicsEconomic growthSociologyEngineeringWaste managementCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper examines the informal recovery of cardboard by Mexicans in Laredo, Texas, which is then recycled in Mexico. Cardboard collecting in the area shows strong backward and forward linkages with the formal sector and with the international economy. Scavenging in the area illustrates the ongoing international economic integration between Mexico and the U.S. The paper challenges previous characterizations of scavengers as being poor and marginal; argues that scavengers should be categorized as informal entrepreneurs, and advocates the use of a joint qualitative/quantitative methodology in the study of scavenging. It also argues that public policy should support scavenging activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Borderlands StudiesSame topicTaxation and Compliance StudiesFrench-language works237,207