MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167559144 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(13)70033-0

Research capacity strengthening in Honduras

2013· letter· en· W2167559144 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ana Sánchez, Maritza Canales, Lourdes Enríquez, Ada Argentina Zelaya, Vilma Esther Espinoza, Gustavo Fontecha

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiotechnology and Related Fields
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansPovertyProductivityScopusCapacity buildingPolitical scienceEconomic growthDeveloping countryLaggingInvestment (military)Library scienceMedicineMEDLINEEconomicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A strong research capacity and robust research systems are essential contributors to the health and development of nations.1Global Forum for Health Research. The 10/90 Report on Health Research 2001–2002. Geneva; 2002.Google Scholar This recognition has prompted significant investments in higher education, research, and innovation in Latin America, a region where health research has traditionally been weak.2Becerra F Cuervo LG Health research in Latin America.Lancet. 2010; 375: 120Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar Unsurprisingly, this expansion in scientific productivity has not been equally distributed, and most Central American countries are deemed to be scientifically lagging.3Wagner C Brahmakulam I Jackson B Wong A Yoda T Science and Technology Collaboration: Building capacity in developing countries?.http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2005/MR1357.0.pdfDate: March, 2001Google Scholar In Honduras, current health research capacity is small. While neighbouring countries take actions to make research a national priority, conditions of extreme poverty, insecurity, and inequity make envisioning the role research plays in society difficult for Honduran leaders. Accordingly, investment in science and technology in Honduras has been abysmally low (roughly 0·04% of the GDP),4RICYTInter-American-TNfSaTI-I-AaUpdated science and technology indicators up to the year 2010 by country: Honduras.http://db.ricyt.org/query/HN/1990,2010/calculadosGoogle Scholar which naturally translates into negligible levels of research productivity. Without the research activity that would demand a formal structure, the country has yet to establish a national health research system.2Becerra F Cuervo LG Health research in Latin America.Lancet. 2010; 375: 120Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar So, how to boost Honduras's research capacity if so little exists to begin with? Because of the tendency by funders and researchers from developed countries to invest in countries that have some capacity for health research,5McKee M Stuckler D Basu S Where there is no health research: what can be done to fill the global gaps in health research?.PLoS Med. 2012; 9: e1001209Crossref PubMed Scopus (59) Google Scholar with some exceptions, Honduras has been largely overlooked. We are trying to change this trend. Funded by the Global Health Research Initiative of Canada, we have completed a 5-year project of research capacity strengthening at the largest Honduran academic institution, the National Autonomous University of Honduras. We built and improved on previous models of research capacity strengthening6Velho L Research capacity building for development: from old to new assumptions.Sci Technol Soc. 2004; 9: 171-207Crossref Scopus (16) Google Scholar and used an integrated approach not only focused on individual researchers or providing technical assistance but also on fostering an institutional environment that is supportive of safe and ethical science. Our main objective was to establish a locally owned research-based MSc programme in infectious and zoonotic diseases to continually educate new generations of researchers. Additionally, we expanded research networks, built a state-of-the-art research laboratory, installed the National Autonomous University of Honduras's first non-medical research ethics board, and led the creation of a biosafety training centre. We had many obstacles, but 5 years of arduous work have undoubtedly paid off. Students and researchers associated with the project are showing an increased capacity to do research, generate publications, attract funding, and, very importantly, to pursue collaborations with investigators within the region and beyond. Our work in Honduras helped to bridge the proverbial 10/90 gap1Global Forum for Health Research. The 10/90 Report on Health Research 2001–2002. Geneva; 2002.Google Scholar and increased the demand for a national health research system that would increase the production and quality of health research in the country.2Becerra F Cuervo LG Health research in Latin America.Lancet. 2010; 375: 120Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar We invite the global community to build on our efforts. We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0070.029
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Global HealthSame topicBiotechnology and Related FieldsFrench-language works237,207