MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2167570466 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.032002

Measurement of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:math>lifetime and mass in the ATLAS experiment

2013· article· lv· W2167570466 on OpenAlexafffund
G. Aad, T. Abajyan, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah, S. Abdel Khalek, O. Abdinov, M. Abolins, D. L. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2013
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaH. Lundbeck A/SState Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOMCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueGeorgian National Science FoundationCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMax-Planck-GesellschaftIsrael Science FoundationJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchLundbeckfondenLeverhulme TrustGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAustrian Science FundBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Science CouncilJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloBundesministerium für Wissenschaft und ForschungJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiCERNDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónEuropean CommissionComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaDanmarks GrundforskningsfondTRIUMFAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaNational Science FoundationTürkiye Atom Enerjisi Kurumu
KeywordsLambdaPhysicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)AlgorithmChemistryComputer scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A measurement of the ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{b}^{0}$ lifetime and mass in the decay channel ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{b}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}J/\ensuremath{\psi}({\ensuremath{\mu}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{\ensuremath{-}}){\ensuremath{\Lambda}}^{0}(p{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}})$ is presented. The analysis uses a signal sample of about 2200 ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{b}^{0}$ and ${\overline{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{b}^{0}$ decays that are reconstructed in $4.9\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{fb}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ of ATLAS $pp$ collision data collected in 2011 at the LHC center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV. A simultaneous mass and decay time maximum likelihood fit is used to extract the ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{b}^{0}$ lifetime and mass. They are measured to be ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{b}}=1.449\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.036(\mathrm{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.017(\mathrm{syst})\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{ps}$ and ${m}_{{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{b}}=5619.7\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.7(\mathrm{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.1(\mathrm{syst})\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology→Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→