Site‐directed mutagenesis of the type II TGF‐β receptor indicates a ligand‐binding site distinct from that of the type II activin receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Site-directed mutagenesis was used to map the ligand-binding surface of the type II transforming growth factor-beta receptor extracellular domain (TbetaRII-ECD). Two putative ligand-binding sites were probed, the first being a predicted hydrophobic patch, the second being the finger 1 surface loop. Nine residues were mutated in the context of full-length TbetaRII and the effect of these mutations on ligand-binding and receptor signaling was analyzed. Complementary information was obtained by examining 'natural' evolutionary TbetaRII mutations. Together, the results indicate that residues within the finger 1 region, but not the hydrophobic patch, of the TbetaRII-ECD are required for productive ligand-binding. We conclude that, surprisingly, the ECDs of TbetaRII and type II activin receptor utilize distinct interacting surfaces for binding their respective ligands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".