MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167572166 · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02378-5

Site‐directed mutagenesis of the type II TGF‐β receptor indicates a ligand‐binding site distinct from that of the type II activin receptor

2002· article· en· W2167572166 on OpenAlexaff
Alain Guimond, Traian Sulea, Ally Pen, Po Hien Ear, Maureen D. O'Connor‐McCourt

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTGF-β signaling in diseases
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsACVR2BBinding siteLigand (biochemistry)Site-directed mutagenesisReceptorMutagenesisActivin receptorActivin type 2 receptorsBiologyChemistryBiophysicsTGF beta signaling pathwayBiochemistryMutationMutantGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Site-directed mutagenesis was used to map the ligand-binding surface of the type II transforming growth factor-beta receptor extracellular domain (TbetaRII-ECD). Two putative ligand-binding sites were probed, the first being a predicted hydrophobic patch, the second being the finger 1 surface loop. Nine residues were mutated in the context of full-length TbetaRII and the effect of these mutations on ligand-binding and receptor signaling was analyzed. Complementary information was obtained by examining 'natural' evolutionary TbetaRII mutations. Together, the results indicate that residues within the finger 1 region, but not the hydrophobic patch, of the TbetaRII-ECD are required for productive ligand-binding. We conclude that, surprisingly, the ECDs of TbetaRII and type II activin receptor utilize distinct interacting surfaces for binding their respective ligands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicTGF-β signaling in diseasesFrench-language works237,207