MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167606772 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2009.2034264

Space-Vector-Modulated Hybrid Bidirectional Current Source Converter

2010· article· en· W2167606772 on OpenAlexaff
Luiz A. C. Lopes, M. F. Naguib

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommutationElectronic engineeringSpace vector modulationComputer scienceFlexibility (engineering)Total harmonic distortionConvertersPower (physics)Control theory (sociology)EngineeringVoltagePulse-width modulationElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current source converters (CSCs) present the desirable characteristics of inherent load and converter short-circuits protection. Six-switch (fully controllable) CSCs are used in applications requiring the flexibility and performance, which is lacking in more affordable phase-controlled SCR-based CSCs. Hybrid CSC (HCSCs) with both SCRs and force-commutated switches usually offer a compromise solution regarding cost and performance. This paper discusses the use of space vector modulation (SVM) techniques to enhance the performance of a bidirectional three-SCR four-switch HCSC. The main challenge is to generate the gating signals online, so that the SCRs are safely commutated with variable power factor, reduced switching losses and harmonic distortion, and increased gain. This requires the use of appropriate sequences of states with minimum states on times. The commutation issues of SCRs in an HCSC are discussed in details, and two SVM strategies are proposed to implement HCSCs with only active and with active and natural commutation. They result in HCSCs with features comparable to those of the conventional six-switch CSC. Analytical equations describing the limitations of the two techniques are derived. A sample case study discussing the power losses on individual switches is presented. Experimental results obtained in a laboratory prototype are provided to verify the theoretical analysis and demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207