Low frequency harmonic components of leakage current as a diagnostic tool to study aging of silicone rubber insulators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presents the results of an investigation in which the low frequency harmonic components of leakage current (i.e. the third and fifth harmonic components) have been used to study the aging of silicone rubber (SIR) insulators in salt-fog. The test was conducted for 120 hours; 100 hours with fog and 20 hours without fog. The leakage current was measured for different SIR insulators during salt-fog and analyzed using fast Fourier transform (FFT). Two different conductivity levels were used during the test under 22.8 V/mm electric stress for all insulators. It was noticed that the leakage current waveform changed from a small capacitive sinusoidal current to highly distorted resistive current during salt-fog. Also, a noticeable difference in the behavior of the fundamental component of the leakage current and its corresponding third and fifth harmonic components was seen. At some instances when the fundamental component of the leakage current was relatively high and the low harmonic components are low, no arcing was seen. Arcing was seen only when the value of the harmonic components increased. Also, it was found that the increase in the low frequency harmonic components is more than the increase in the fundamental as the conductivity level of the salt-fog is increased. This suggests that low frequency harmonic components of leakage current could be a better indication of arcing and hence aging of SIR insulators than the peak value of the leakage current alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".