MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167639215 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2008.2011829

Large-System-Based Performance Analysis and Design of Multiuser Cooperative Networks

2009· article· en· W2167639215 on OpenAlexaff
Keyvan Zarifi, Sofiène Affes, Ali Ghrayeb

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayComputer scienceInterference (communication)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Noise (video)Channel (broadcasting)Code division multiple accessComputer networkSignal-to-interference-plus-noise ratioNoise powerRelay channelChannel state informationMultiuser detectionPower (physics)TelecommunicationsWirelessArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the performance of the cooperative multiuser direct-sequence code-division multiple-access (DS-CDMA) system is analyzed in the asymptotic regime where both the spreading codes and the number of users grow unboundedly large with the same ratio. Assuming that each terminal is paired with another user which, in addition to transmitting its own data, estimates and relay the information transmitted from its partner, a simple approximate signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) expression is derived that is independent from the spreading codes and explicitly accounts for the effects of the multiple-access interference (MAI) and the relay noise. The so-obtained SINR expression is then computed based entirely on the available local information and without any knowledge about the interfering users. The results obtained above are then used to optimally design the cooperative system. In particular, it is shown how the amount of cooperation between each collaborating pair can be adjusted to simultaneously achieve a preassigned target SINR for both users. Based on the local information, the globally optimal amount of the relay power is obtained that maximizes the achieved SINR at the access point. It is shown that increasing the relay power does not necessarily result in improving the quality of reception at the access point and, to maximize each user's SINR, its relay power should be carefully adjusted based on the environmental parameters such as the interpartner channel link and the powers of MAI and the relay noise. The connection between the cooperative and the conventional multiuser systems is also studied and simulations are used to demonstrate the validity of the analytical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207