MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167702743 · doi:10.5430/jnep.v3n9p48

Persistence among graduate nursing students enrolled in an online course

2013· article· en· W2167702743 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peggy Ward‐Smith, Carol Schmer, Jane A. Peterson, Carolyn Hart

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOnline and Blended Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersistence (discontinuity)AttritionOnline coursePsychologyIntervention (counseling)MedicineGraduate studentsMedical educationNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Attrition in online courses, when compared to face-to-face courses, is higher. Student persistence affects the ability to complete an online course. The aim of this study was to quantitatively measure persistence among nursing students enrolled in a master’s level required theory course. Study data, collected during the first two weeks of the semester, included responses to the Persistence Scale for Online Education (PSOE) and completion of a demographic data sheet. Data from 26 consented students revealed an overall moderate level of persistence. The four students who reported low levels of persistence failed to complete the course. It appears that the PSOE can reliably identify the student at-risk for course incompletion and may be useful in identifying those for whom intervention would be helpful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.498
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing Education and PracticeSame topicOnline and Blended LearningFrench-language works237,207