MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Syringomyelia and chronic respiratory failure in a term infant delivered by Caesarean section

2007· article· en· W2167728584 on OpenAlexaff
Guilherme SantʼAnna, C T Azevedo, Aelyzza Antonio Simas, B P Castro, C A Bhering

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypotoniaCaesarean sectionClonusSyringomyeliaRespiratory failureSpasticityPresentation (obstetrics)StridorSwallowingPediatricsVaginal deliveryDysphagiaSurgeryAnesthesiaMagnetic resonance imagingPregnancyAirway

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The case of a term, male neonate (birthweight 3785g) with cephalic presentation, Caesarean-section (C-section) delivery, and failure to thrive is reported. The infant presented with generalized hypotonia and respiratory failure immediately following birth. An initial diagnosis of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy was made. However, ventilator dependency and slow recovery of generalized tonus over the following weeks could not be explained. Late cervical magnetic resonance imaging showed extensive syringomyelia from C2 to C7. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of syringomyelia after a C-section delivery following cephalic presentation without any associated abnormalities. Follow-up at 2 years of age revealed no improvement on neurological examination: poor head control, difficulty swallowing, flaccid paralysis of upper limbs, and spasticity of lower limbs with exacerbated deep reflexes and spontaneous clonus. Difficulties in establishing the diagnosis and managing the case are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.718

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental Medicine & Child NeurologySame topicSpinal Dysraphism and MalformationsFrench-language works237,207