MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167755480 · doi:10.3917/psyt.153.0093

El impacto de los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria en los cuidadores informales: Una revisión de la literatura

2009· article· fr· W2167755480 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychotropes · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé L’objectif de cet article est de présenter un panorama des résultats des recherches, essentiellement qualitatives et anglophones, qui se sont penchées sur la question de l’impact du trouble du comportement alimentaire - TCA - sur les proches ( non professional caregivers en langue anglaise). Les recherches recensées décrivent l’impact au quotidien du TCA sur la vie des proches : confrontation permanente aux symptômes, détérioration des relations avec le patient et stigmatisation. Elles rapportent aussi les impacts émotionnels et la détresse psychologique éprouvée par les proches, ainsi que les besoins générés par l’émergence des troubles : essentiellement besoins en information, en guidance et en soutien social et émotionnel. Elles soulignent l’importance de prendre en compte le vécu des proches dans le traitement du TCA et ouvrent des pistes nouvelles pour leur implication dans les protocoles de traitement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it