MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167818703 · doi:10.1109/9.964697

Stochastic stability analysis of fault-tolerant control systems in the presence of noise

2001· article· en· W2167818703 on OpenAlexaff
Mufeed Mahmoud, Jin Jiang, Youmin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExponential stabilityControl theory (sociology)Markov processNoise (video)MathematicsLyapunov functionStability (learning theory)Fault detection and isolationStochastic processExponential functionApplied mathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsControl (management)Mathematical analysisNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stochastic stability of fault tolerant control systems (FTCSs) in the presence of noise are,analyzed using the Lyapunov function approach. In particular, the FTCS with a Markovian fault detection and isolation process having transition probabilities conditioned on the state of another Markovian process representing component failures, is considered. The almost sure asymptotic stability in probability and the exponential stability in the mean square are considered. Specifically, a testable necessary and sufficient condition for the exponential stability in the mean square is derived. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the theoretical analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations85
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207