MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neuronal and Glial Membrane Potentials during Sleep and Paroxysmal Oscillations in the Neocortex

2000· article· en· W2167824328 on OpenAlexafffund
Florin Amzica, Mircea Steriade

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersMedical Research CouncilMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsDepolarizationNeuroscienceNeocortexMembrane potentialNeuronInhibitory postsynaptic potentialExcitatory postsynaptic potentialElectrophysiologyChemistryBiologyBiophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigated the fluctuations in the membrane potential of cortical neurons and glial cells during the slow sleep oscillation and spike-wave (SW) seizures. We performed dual neuron-glia intracellular recordings together with multisite field potential recordings from cortical suprasylvian association areas 5 and 7 of cats under ketamine-xylazine anesthesia. Electrical stimuli applied to the cortex elicited responses consisting of a biphasic depolarization in glial cells, which was associated with an EPSP-IPSP sequence in neurons. During the slow (<1 Hz) oscillation, extracellular measurements of the potassium concentration revealed periodic increases with an amplitude of 1-2 mm, similar in shape to glial activities. We suggest that, through their uptake mechanisms, glia cells modulate the neuronal excitability and contribute to the pacing of the slow oscillation. The slow oscillation often evolved into SW paroxysms, mimicking sleep-triggered seizures. This transition was associated with increased coupling between the depolarizing events in neurons and glial cells. During seizures, the glial membrane potential displayed phasic negative events related to the onset of the paroxysmal depolarizing shifts in neurons. These events were not voltage dependent and increased their incidence and amplitude with the development of the seizure. It is suggested that the intraglial transient negativities represent field reflections of synchronized neuronal potentials. We propose that the mechanisms underlying the neuron-glia communication include, besides the traditional neurotransmitter- and ion-mediated pathways, field effects crossing their membranes as a function of the state of the cortical network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations156
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207