Dynamics of the Apical Plasma Membrane Recycling System During Cell Division
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The members of the family of Rab11 small GTPases are critical regulators of the plasma membrane vesicle recycling system. While previous studies have determined that the Golgi apparatus disperses during mitosis and reorganizes after cytokinesis, the fate of the recycling system during the cell cycle is more obscure. We have now studied in MDCK cells the fate during mitosis of an apical recycling system cargo, the polymeric IgA receptor (pIgAR), and regulators of the recycling system, Rab11a and its interacting proteins myosin Vb, Rab11-FIP1, Rab11-FIP2 and pp75/Rip11. Rab11a, pIgAR and myosin Vb containing vesicles dispersed into diffuse puncta in the cytosol during prophase and then became clustered near the spindle poles after metaphase, increasing in intensity throughout telophase. A similar pattern was observed for Rab11-FIP1 and Rab11-FIP2. However, Rab11-FIP1 lost colocalization with other recycling system markers during late prophase, relocating to the pericentriolar material. During telophase, Rab11-FIP1 returned to recycling system vesicles. Western blot analysis indicated that both Rab11a and pIgAR remained associated with membrane vesicles throughout the cell cycle. This behavior of the Rab11a-containing apical recycling endosome system during division was distinct from that of the Golgi apparatus. These results indicate that critical components of the apical recycling system remain associated on vesicles throughout the cell cycle and may provide a means for rapid re-establishment of plasma membrane components after mitosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it