Pharmacological characterisation of novel kinin B<sub>2</sub> receptor ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peptide and nonpeptide compounds have been shown to interact specifically with B2 receptors of three different species, namely human, rabbit, and pig. Peptide agonists and nonpeptide antagonists show marked differences in potencies and suggest the existence of B2 receptor subtypes. This conclusion is based on data obtained with the modified agonist peptide LF 150943 whose potency (pEC50 9.4) is at least 100-fold higher in rabbit than in humans (7.4) and pig (6.7). The same conclusion can be drawn from data obtained with antagonists that are more potent in humans (LF 160687, pA2 9.2) than in rabbit (8.7) and pig (8.2) or with antagonists (S 1567) that show the opposite potency order, being much weaker in humans (pA2 6.9) than in rabbit (7.6) and pig (9.4). Two other compounds (FR 173657 and FR 172357) show similar pharmacological spectra as S 1567 and differ from LF 160687.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".