MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167865308 · doi:10.1109/milcom.2000.905085

Optimum combining of multiple shipboard satcom antennas for hemispheric coverage

2002· article· en· W2167865308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
FundersMinistère de la Défense NationaleDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsDirectional antennaComputer scienceRange (aeronautics)Phased arrayReflective array antennaZenithCommunications satelliteConformal antennaAntenna (radio)Slot antennaElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringRemote sensingSatelliteAerospace engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to avoid blockage and other siting problems, it is sometimes necessary to distribute a number of satcom antennas around a ship. These antennas may have limited scan range, such as with phased arrays. In combination, these antennas must provide complete hemispheric coverage even under maximum pitch and roll. In this paper, the arrangement and orientation of the individual antennas is determined that gives the minimum individual scan range. This determination is done for configurations including 3-, 4- and 5-side-facing antennas alone, and then 3-, 4-, and 5- side-facing antennas plus a zenith-facing face. Methods for plotting the outer scan contours are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207