MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2167912171 · doi:10.1139/p11-091

CXO CDFS J033260.0-274748: A quasar with unusual spectra possibly blueshifted?<sup>1</sup>This paper is being published without benefit of authors’ corrections.

2011· article· en· W2167912171 on OpenAlexaffvenue
D. Basu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsRedshiftQuasarSpectral lineEmission spectrumBlueshiftWavelengthAbsorption (acoustics)OutflowAstronomyOpticsGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CXO CDFS J033260.0-274748 is a quasi-stellar object (QSO) and identification of several emission lines observed in its optical spectrum has led to the determination of its redshift as 2.579. On the other hand, the Chandra ACIS-I spectrum has detected a strong absorption feature at the observed wavelength around 6.3 keV that cannot be identified under normal physical conditions. The authors have invoked an unusually large outflow bulk velocity of 0.7c–0.8c to explain the feature. However, such extraordinarily high bulk velocities are unprecedented in the extragalactic literature. We show here that the optical emission lines and the X-ray absorption feature can be identified with search lines of longer wavelengths that have been blueshifted and do not need any unusual physical conditions to be invoked. The blueshifted spectra are explained as being due to the net motion of the QSO along with the absorbing cloud towards the observer. Two scenarios are proposed, namely, the ejection mechanism and the multiverse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations→French-language works237,207→