Performance of a BPSK NB Receiver in MB-OFDM UWB Interference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we evaluate the effect of multi-band orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (MB-OFDM) ultra-wide-band (UWB) interference on a narrowband (NB) receiver. For this purpose, we first derive an analytical expression for the exact moment generating function (MGF) of MB-OFDM UWB interference. Subsequently the bit error rate (BER) of a binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) NB receiver impaired by MB-OFDM UWB interference and additive white Gaussian noise is analyzed. We show that for NB signal bandwidths much smaller and much larger than the OFDM sub-carrier spacing a Gaussian approximation (GA ) and an impulsive GA of the MB-OFDM UWB interference leads to accurate performance predictions, respectively. However, for most NB signal bandwidths of practical interest the exact BER analysis has to be used to obtain meaningful results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".