MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167940464 · doi:10.1109/icuwb.2009.5288845

A compressed sensing receiver for bursty communication with UWB Impulse Radio

2009· article· en· W2167940464 on OpenAlexaff
Anand Oka, Lutz Lampe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltra-Wideband Communications Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDemodulationTransmitterNyquist rateCompressed sensingElectronic engineeringWidebandRadio receiver designBaudUltra-widebandReal-time computingTelecommunicationsSampling (signal processing)AlgorithmDetectorChannel (broadcasting)Transmission (telecommunications)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a novel receiver for ultra-wideband impulse-radio communication in bursty applications like wireless sensor networks. It is based on the principle of compressed sensing, and exploits the sparsity of the transmitted signal to achieve reliable demodulation. Instead of a full-fledged high-rate A/D, a modest number of projections of the received signal are acquired using analog correlators, and a joint decoding of the time of arrival and the data bits is performed from these under-sampled measurements via an efficient quadratic program. The receiver does not use wideband analog delay lines, and is robust to large timing uncertainty, hence the transmitter need not waste power on explicit training headers for timing synchronization. Moreover, the receiver can operate in a regime of heavy inter-symbol interference (ISI), and allows a very high baud rate (close to the Nyquist rate). Its performance is shown to remain close to the maximum likelihood receiver under every scenario of under-sampling, timing uncertainty, ISI, and delay spread.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltra-Wideband Communications TechnologyFrench-language works237,207