MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167940708 · doi:10.1002/mren.201400053

Effect of Monomer Concentration and pH on Reaction Kinetics and Copolymer Microstructure of Acrylamide/Acrylic Acid Copolymer

2015· article· en· W2167940708 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Reaction Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCopolymerAcrylic acidMonomerPolymer chemistryKineticsAcrylamideReactivity (psychology)Triad (sociology)PolymerizationChemistryMaterials scienceChemical engineeringPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acrylamide (AAm)/acrylic acid (AAc) copolymer application performance is tied to copolymer properties, which in turn are related to the kinetics of the copolymerization. A systematic study has been conducted to investigate the effect of reaction factors such as total monomer concentration and solution pH on polymerization kinetics and copolymer microstructure. To study the effect of these factors, reliable reactivity ratios were estimated first. The trends in copolymer composition, molecular weight, sequence length distribution, and triad fractions were subsequently examined. Having a better understanding of kinetic profiles is needed in order to manipulate influential factors for tailoring AAm/AAc copolymer properties for the desired application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it