MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167952050 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2011.2142172

Efficient Globally Optimal Registration of Remote Sensing Imagery via Quasi-Random Scale-Space Structural Correlation Energy Functional

2011· article· en· W2167952050 on OpenAlexaff
Wen Zhang, Alexander Wong, Akshaya Mishra, Paul Fieguth, David A. Clausi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersU.S. Geological Survey
KeywordsComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Remote sensingArtificial intelligenceEnergy functionalEnergy (signal processing)Image registrationPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionScale (ratio)Image (mathematics)MathematicsGeologyStatisticsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel energy functional for automatic registration of remote sensing imagery based on quasi-random scale-space structural correlation is presented. The structural correlation energy functional takes advantage of the fact that, for many types of remote sensing imagery, there exist common structures at different scales even if the acquired images have very different intensity characteristics. The proposed energy functional also takes advantage of the noise robustness and feature localization properties of quasi-random scale-space theory. An efficient globally exhaustive optimization strategy in the frequency domain is developed for registering remote sensing imagery based on the proposed energy functional. Promising test results on interband, intraband, and intermodal remote sensing image sets show that the proposed method has the advantage of being robust to differing sensing conditions and large misalignments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing LettersSame topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207