Temperature-dependent nonradiative recombination processes in GaN-based nanowire white-light-emitting diodes on silicon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we have performed a detailed investigation of the temperature- and current-dependent emission characteristics of nanowire light-emitting diodes, wherein InGaN/GaN dot-in-a-wire nanoscale heterostructures and a p-doped AlGaN electron blocking layer are incorporated in the device's active region to achieve white-light emission and to prevent electron overflow, respectively. Through these studies, the Auger coefficient is estimated to be in the range of ∼10(-34) cm(6) s(-1) or less, which is nearly four orders of magnitude smaller than the commonly reported values of planar InGaN/GaN heterostructures, suggesting Auger recombination plays an essentially negligible role in the performance of GaN-based nanowire light-emitting diodes. It is observed, however, that the performance of such nanowire LEDs suffers severely from Shockley-Read-Hall recombination, which can account for nearly 40% of the total carrier recombination under moderate injection conditions (∼100 A cm(-2)) at room temperature. The Shockley-Read-Hall nonradiative lifetime is estimated to be in the range of a few nanoseconds at room temperature, which correlates well with the surface recombination velocity of GaN and the wire diameters used in this experiment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".