MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167968888 · doi:10.5555/2693848.2694257

Streamlining an indoor positioning architecture based on field testing in pipe spool fabrication shop

2014· article· en· W2167968888 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWinter Simulation Conference · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRSSProfiling (computer programming)Computer scienceReal-time computingFabricationTracking (education)Operating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the implementation of an indoor positioning architecture based on radio frequency profiling using received signal strength (RSS) measurements for localizing and tracking resources in construction-related applications. The profiling-based approach is coupled with commonly used noise filtering algorithms in order to cope with the application of material tracking in a pipe spool fabrication shop. With 95% likelihood, consistent positioning accuracy of 1-2 meters away from the actual position of a tracked tag can be obtained in the fabrication shop--which is deemed sufficient for materials and labor hours tracking in support of shop production control. In particular, through simulation experiments using data collected from a pipe fabrication shop we investigated the sensitivity of the resulting localization accuracy with respect to the quantity and layout of the reference points, aimed at streamlining system updating and simplifying solution implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it