Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our leaders are challenged to lead in a world of increasing ambiguity and complexity, to make sense and to take effective action. The field of organization studies has developed a growing interest in ‘aesthetics’ in part as a response to such unprecedented conditions. From this perspective leaders require a new capacity comprised of aesthetic judgment, a perceptual stance and an ability to create plausible narratives of the world. The exercise of this aesthetic capacity is seen through the artistry shown by the Artist-Leader. The question of how to develop this capacity in leaders then becomes the primary challenge for designers. The current predominant approach to leader development is limited for this task, so the pedagogical approach outlined here draws predominantly on an aesthetically-informed hermeneutics. The concept of the aesthetic encounter, with its underlying conditions, is posited as the means for fostering the artist-leader’s innate imagination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it