An Interference Aware Distributed Resource Management Scheme for CDMA-Based Wireless Mesh Backbone
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, with a cross-layer design principle, we propose an interference aware distributed resource management scheme for a code-division multiple access (CDMA)-based wireless mesh backbone (consisting of a number of wireless routers at fixed sites). Specifically, benefiting from the fixed location of wireless routers, the power allocation is based on the length of the transmission path, so as to ensure a certain level of fairness among the routers. For a new call arrival, based on the maximum sustainable interference concept, each existing receiver (rather than the potential sender) estimates its experienced interference level under the hypothesis that the new call is admitted. If the interference is not tolerable, the existing receiver rejects the new call by sending a blocking-signal. The main advantages of our proposed scheme are the low control message overhead for easy implementation, and the accurate interference estimation. Simulation results are presented to evaluate the performance of our scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it