MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168005802 · doi:10.1109/icmel.2008.4559284

Towards low-cost, high-sensitivity, integrated biosensors

2008· article· en· W2168005802 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Jamal Deen, M. Waleed Shinwari, P.R. Selvaganapathy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiosensorTransistorSensitivity (control systems)Integrated circuitElectronicsNanotechnologyComputer scienceMaterials scienceInsulator (electricity)Electronic circuitElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringVoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The early detection of pathogens in a solution sample using a biosensor and associated electronics manufactured in a mainstream semiconductor process is currently attracting much research and development interests around the globe. This is primarily because such a system will be low-cost, easily manufactured, and can offer very high sensitivities, thus potentially stopping the rapid spread of diseases due to water or food contamination. In this paper, we describe our current research on the design and development of an electrolyte-insulator-semiconductor field-effect transistor to detect hybridization of target DNA oligonucleotides using functionalized probes tethered to the insulator's surface of the transistor. This biological sensor, when integrated with associated signal conditioning and processing circuits, promises high sensitivity and cheaper manufacturing costs than current labeled DNA microarray optical sensing systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207