MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168022895 · doi:10.5430/ijba.v4n3p86

Relating Electricity Differentials to Nigeria per Capita Income: A Distributed Lag Approach

2013· article· en· W2168022895 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nwosu Chinedu Anthony, Marcus Samuel Nnamdi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Business Administration · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnergy and Environment Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricityPer capitaDistributed lagPer capita incomeEconomicsLagTransmission (telecommunications)Distribution (mathematics)EconometricsAgricultural economicsDemographic economicsPopulationMathematicsTelecommunicationsDemographyComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to proffer an explanation of comparative low per capita income in Nigeria using data on electricity loss. We hypothesized that per capita income is a function of electricity loss which we defined as the differential between actual electricity generated and actual electricity consumed. Using time series data from 1970 to 2005, we estimated a distributed lag model with Newey-West HAC standard errors. From the estimated model which was truncated at three lag lengths, we established an inverse relationship between per capita income and total electricity loss with all the distributed lag variables being statistically significant. The implication of this result is that electricity loss generally affect national output negatively which in turn reduces our per capita (income of the people). Policy measures that will ensure adequate protection and system stability of the existing fragile transmission and distribution network, the strengthening and expansion of the transmission and distribution infrastructure will reduce electricity loss and eventually improve our per capita income.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Business AdministrationSame topicEnergy and Environment ImpactsFrench-language works237,207