MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168028362 · doi:10.1109/tim.2008.917673

A Technique for Differential Noise Figure Measurement of Differential LNAs

2008· article· en· W2168028362 on OpenAlexaff
Leonid Belostotski, J.W. Haslett

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersSmithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
KeywordsNoise figureNoise temperatureNoise (video)Low-noise amplifierEffective input noise temperatureNoise-figure meterNoise measurementWidebandPhysicsDifferential (mechanical device)Electronic engineeringElectrical engineeringAmplifierComputer scienceAcousticsEngineeringNoise reductionPhase noiseCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an approach to measure the noise figure of a differential low-noise amplifier (LNA) based on familiar ldquocold-hotrdquo single-ended noise figure measurements. To demonstrate the usefulness of this approach, measurement results are presented for a wideband differential LNA designed to be used as the first stage of the receiver in the Square Kilometre Array radio telescope. The presented LNA achieves less than 0.41 dB of differential noise figure in the 700 MHz to 1.4 GHz band, differential S <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">11</sub> <-13 dB, differential S <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">21</sub> between 18 and 14 dB, single-ended output P1 dB of -8.2 dBm, and output IP3 of -1 dBm while consuming 81 mA from a 1.3-V supply. The approach of measuring the differential noise figure may be automated with one switch at the output of a standard noise source and one switch at the input to a standard noise figure analyzer or a noise figure meter, allowing for automated noise figure measurements of differential LNAs based on the differential pair topology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207