MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168034822

Spectral Regularization for Max-Margin Sequence Tagging

2014· article· en· W2168034822 on OpenAlexafffund
Ariadna Quattoni, Borja Balle, Xavier Carreras, Amir Globerson

Bibliographic record

VenueUPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersIsrael Science FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsRegularization (linguistics)Margin (machine learning)Latent variableOperator (biology)ObservableProximal gradient methods for learningMathematical optimizationComputer scienceConvex optimizationStructured predictionAlgorithmMathematicsMatrix completionArtificial intelligenceSequence (biology)Regular polygonMachine learningConvex combination
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We frame max-margin learning of latent variable structured prediction models as a convex opti-mization problem, making use of scoring func-tions computed by input-output observable oper-ator models. This learning problem can be ex-pressed as an optimization problem involving a low-rank Hankel matrix that represents the input-output operator model. The direct outcome of our work is a new spectral regularization method for max-margin structured prediction. Our exper-iments confirm that our proposed regularization framework leads to an effective way of control-ling the capacity of structured prediction models. 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya)Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207