MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168061917 · doi:10.1039/b103237m

Turbulent fronts in resonantly forced oscillatory systems

2001· article· en· W2168061917 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFaraday Discussions · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTurbulencePhysicsForcing (mathematics)BifurcationMechanicsPhase (matter)Front (military)BistabilityDiffusionNon-equilibrium thermodynamicsClassical mechanicsNonlinear systemMeteorologyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phase fronts in the forced complex Ginzburg-Landau equation, a model of a resonantly forced oscillatory reaction-diffusion system, are studied in the 3:1 resonance regime. The focus is on the turbulent (Benjamin-Feir-unstable) regime of the corresponding unforced system; in the forced system, phase fronts between spatially uniform phase-locked states exhibit complex dynamics. In one dimension, for strong forcing, phase fronts move with constant velocity. As the forcing intensity is lowered there is a bifurcation to oscillatory motion, followed by a bifurcation to a regime in which fronts multiply via the nucleation of domains of the third homogeneous phase in the front. In two dimensional systems, rough fronts with turbulent, complex internal structure may arise. For a critical value of the forcing intensity there is a nonequilibrium phase transition in which the turbulent interface grows to occupy the entire system. The phenomena we explore can be probed by experiments on periodically forced light sensitive reaction-diffusion systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it