MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168134681 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2004.1347670

Single-ended DSL line tester

2004· article· en· W2168134681 on OpenAlexafffund
B. Celaya, D.E. Dodds

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRFID technology advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDigital subscriber lineReflectometryReflection (computer programming)Telephone lineFault (geology)Computer scienceElectric power transmissionClassification of discontinuitiesElectronic engineeringTransmission lineElectrical engineeringLine (geometry)Electromagnetic coilReturn lossTransmission (telecommunications)Time domainTelecommunicationsEngineeringTelephonyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Telephone lines can have discontinuities caused by line faults, coils and bridge taps that impede transmission. Telephone companies (telcos) must locate and repair these faults in order to enable high-speed data transmission. It is useful for a telco to 'prequalify' lines for future DSL services, so a customer can be promptly informed if high-speed services can be supplied This paper proposes a new technique called frequency domain reflectometry (FDR) to accurately locate impairments in telephone lines and determine the reflection magnitude caused by faults. The measurement produces a result similar to the well-known time domain reflectometer (TDR); however, DSP techniques are now applied to provide enhanced resolution and range beyond 3 km. In addition to reflection magnitude, the new technique can measure reflection angle which helps determine the nature of the fault (open circuit, short circuit, broken wire, coil, etc.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRFID technology advancementsFrench-language works237,207