An Integrated System to Select, Position, and Simulate Mobile Cranes for Complex Industrial Projects
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Determining feasible mobile crane configurations and positions on a complex industrial construction projects that are free of spatial conflicts and the subsequent scheduling of the lifts is important to the productivity and safety of a project. This paper focuses on the integration of a crane dimensional and capacity database with a project's lifted object information to select and position the cranes and then utilize expert knowledge to simulate the heavy lift plan. The system uses dimensional and coordinate data instead of CAD software for computation of crane position areas amongst known obstructions and boundary limits. The crane position area is specific to a crane model and identifies where the center of rotation of the crane can be placed without having any part of the crane body contact the known obstructions and boundary limits. This analysis is performed for multiple cranes and lifted object scenarios to develop a list of possible options. Schedule date constraints and logic are used to simulate and optimize the schedule and crane selection. This provides the practitioner with an effective planning tool to select, position and schedule cranes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it