Quand la divergence devient exclusion : perceptions des châtiments corporels par les parents et les adolescents immigrants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Cette recherche répond à un double objectif : 1) documenter les principales normes autour de la discipline physique et de l’abus physique, chez des parents et des adolescents immigrants issus de deux minorités ethnoculturelles; 2) examiner l’impact des divergences perçues entre les normes d’origines et celles de la société d’accueil sur la relation entre la famille et le monde social extérieur. L’échantillon est composé de 40 participants : 10 parents et 10 adolescents en provenance du Maghreb, et 10 parents et 10 adolescents en provenance de l’Amérique-latine. L’analyse qualitative des données met en lumière la complexité des critères utilisés pour juger de l’adéquation d’une pratique disciplinaire. De plus, les divergences perçues entre les normes de la famille et celles de la société hôte, ne se révèlent pas comme un facteur de risque en soi mais le deviennent lorsqu’elles sont accompagnées d’une image négative, projetée par la société d’accueil, sur la famille immigrante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".