MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168182883 · doi:10.1080/019131201300004654

Angiomyolipoma: Immunohistochemical and Ultrastructural Study of 14 Cases

2001· article· en· W2168182883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrastructural Pathology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistogenesisAngiomyolipomaPathologyPericyteImmunohistochemistryPerivascular Epithelioid CellUltrastructureBiologyEpithelioid cellMesenchymal stem cellAnatomyEosinophilicClear cellLipomaPopulationMedicineEndothelial stem cellKidneyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angiomyolipoma (AML) is a mesenchymal neoplasm of unclear histogenesis. In addition to varying amounts of smooth muscle, adipose tissue, and blood vessels, it contains a population of clear or pale eosinophilic epithelioid cells often arranged around blood vessels. Various phenotypes of AML have been described: leiomyoma-like, lipoma-like, epithelioid, and atypical. AMLs show consistent immunopositivity for HMB-45. This has been associated with the ultrastructural observation of melanosome-like structures in rare instances. In the present study, 14 AMLs from 13 patients were analyzed by electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry to determine the appearance and nature of cells composing AMLs. Overlap between cell types (spindle smooth muscle cells, epithelioid cells, and adipocytes) was found by both electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Melanosomes were found in 7 tumors. The cell of origin remains mysterious. Nevertheless, the study demonstrates that the AML is likely derived from a single cell that shares homology with the pericyte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.904

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it